{"success":true,"database":"eegdash","data":{"_id":"6953f4239276ef1ee07a329a","dataset_id":"ds002001","associated_paper_doi":"10.1167/19.10.131","authors":["Janine Mendola","Elizabeth Bock"],"bids_version":"1.1.1","contact_info":null,"contributing_labs":null,"data_processed":true,"dataset_doi":"10.18112/openneuro.ds002001.v1.0.0","datatypes":["meg"],"demographics":{"subjects_count":11,"ages":[],"age_min":null,"age_max":null,"age_mean":null,"species":null,"sex_distribution":null,"handedness_distribution":null},"experimental_modalities":null,"external_links":{"paper_url":"https://doi.org/10.1167/19.10.131"},"funding":[],"ingestion_fingerprint":"6c392c0c25c33a291d73b3eb683c8f034255a9b63f57b6425eb8fb552c041d24","license":"PD","n_contributing_labs":null,"name":"Rivalry_Tagging","readme":null,"recording_modality":["meg"],"senior_author":null,"sessions":["20140502","20140507","20140508","20140509","20140512","20140513","20140603"],"size_bytes":87694624374,"source":"openneuro","study_design":null,"study_domain":null,"tasks":["noise","rivalry"],"timestamps":{"digested_at":"2026-05-31T16:11:57.319351+00:00","dataset_created_at":null,"dataset_modified_at":null},"total_files":69,"storage":{"backend":"s3","base":"s3://openneuro.org/ds002001","raw_key":"dataset_description.json","dep_keys":["CHANGES","README.txt"]},"tagger_meta":{"config_hash":"3557b68bca409f28","metadata_hash":"380283f05b61acac","model":"openai/gpt-5.2","tagged_at":"2026-04-07T09:32:40.872789+00:00"},"tags":{"pathology":["Healthy"],"modality":["Visual"],"type":["Perception"],"confidence":{"pathology":0.6,"modality":0.6,"type":0.6},"reasoning":{"few_shot_analysis":"Most similar few-shot examples are the healthy, vision-driven cognitive neuroscience datasets where the task name implies a perceptual paradigm and no clinical recruitment is mentioned. For instance: (1) the \"EEG Motor Movement/Imagery Dataset\" is labeled Healthy when no disorder recruitment is described; this guides using \"Healthy\" rather than \"Unknown\" when metadata lacks any clinical population statement. (2) the schizophrenia example shows that when a specific paradigm/stimulus is described (e.g., \"visual discrimination task\"), modality is set to Visual and type to Perception; by convention, a rivalry paradigm is typically a visual perception/awareness manipulation, so this supports mapping Rivalry to Visual + Perception when no other details are present.","metadata_analysis":"Key available metadata is sparse but task/title cues indicate the paradigm: (1) Title: \"Rivalry_Tagging\". (2) Tasks listed: \"noise\" and \"rivalry\". (3) Participants: \"Subjects: 11\". There is no mention of any diagnosis, patient group, or intervention in the provided metadata.","paper_abstract_analysis":"No useful paper information.","evidence_alignment_check":"Pathology: Metadata says only \"Subjects: 11\" with no diagnosis stated; few-shot convention suggests labeling as Healthy when no clinical recruitment is described. These align (no conflict) but evidence is indirect.\nModality: Metadata says tasks include \"rivalry\" and \"noise\"; few-shot convention suggests rivalry/noise tasks are visual stimulus paradigms (binocular rivalry / visual noise tagging). Alignment is based on task-name inference; no conflict.\nType: Metadata says \"rivalry\" task; few-shot convention maps sensory/perceptual stimulus paradigms to Perception (rather than Motor/Memory/etc.). Alignment is inferential; no conflict.","decision_summary":"Top-2 candidates per category:\n- Pathology: (A) Healthy vs (B) Unknown. Evidence for Healthy: absence of any clinical terms plus generic participant count \"Subjects: 11\"; few-shot convention uses Healthy for non-clinical cohorts when no disorder is stated. Choose Healthy; confidence moderate-low due to no explicit 'healthy' statement.\n- Modality: (A) Visual vs (B) Unknown/Other. Evidence for Visual: title \"Rivalry_Tagging\" and task \"rivalry\" strongly suggest binocular/visual rivalry; task \"noise\" commonly refers to visual noise patterns in vision EEG. Choose Visual; confidence moderate-low because stimulus modality is not explicitly described.\n- Type: (A) Perception vs (B) Attention. Evidence for Perception: rivalry paradigms primarily probe perceptual interpretation/visual awareness; no explicit attention manipulation is provided. Choose Perception; confidence moderate-low due to minimal task description.\nConfidence justification quotes/features used: \"Rivalry_Tagging\"; tasks \"noise\" and \"rivalry\"; participants \"Subjects: 11\"."}},"nemar_citation_count":3,"computed_title":"Rivalry_Tagging","nchans_counts":[],"sfreq_counts":[{"val":2400.0,"count":69}],"stats_computed_at":"2026-05-31T19:34:32.516937+00:00","total_duration_s":null,"canonical_name":null,"name_confidence":0.53,"name_meta":{"suggested_at":"2026-04-14T10:18:35.342Z","model":"openai/gpt-5.2 + openai/gpt-5.4-mini + deterministic_fallback"},"name_source":"author_year","author_year":"Mendola2019","size_human":"81.7 GB","bad_channels_info":null,"associated_paper_meta":{"channel":"crossref-biblio","confidence":"high","author_overlap":2,"is_oa":true,"oa_status":"gold","source":"paper_resolver"}}}