{"success":true,"database":"eegdash","data":{"_id":"6953f4249276ef1ee07a3330","dataset_id":"ds004278","associated_paper_doi":null,"authors":["Alexis Kidder(*)","Anna Corriveau(*)","Lina Teichmann","Susan Wardle","Chris Baker","[(*) = equal contribution]"],"bids_version":"1.6.0","contact_info":["Lina Teichmann","Anna Corriveau","Alexis Kidder"],"contributing_labs":null,"data_processed":false,"dataset_doi":"doi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004278.v1.0.1","datatypes":["meg"],"demographics":{"subjects_count":30,"ages":[21,22,25,23,30,29,28,23,23,27,24,21,23,28,35,25,32,25,24,24,31,22,22,27,22,23,23,24,23,23],"age_min":21,"age_max":35,"age_mean":25.066666666666666,"species":null,"sex_distribution":{"f":21,"m":9},"handedness_distribution":{"r":27,"l":1}},"experimental_modalities":null,"external_links":{"source_url":"https://openneuro.org/datasets/ds004278","osf_url":null,"github_url":null,"paper_url":null},"funding":["Intramural Research Program of the National Institute of Mental Health (ZIAMH002909)"],"ingestion_fingerprint":"8e7a555ee8d9562a6b5b6d78eaefed81c9d5ab7d863f0dd3a213382960433a3f","license":"CC0","n_contributing_labs":null,"name":"Sustained Neural Representations of Personally Familiar People and Places During Cued Recall","readme":"References\n----------\nAppelhoff, S., Sanderson, M., Brooks, T., Vliet, M., Quentin, R., Holdgraf, C., Chaumon, M., Mikulan, E., Tavabi, K., Höchenberger, R., Welke, D., Brunner, C., Rockhill, A., Larson, E., Gramfort, A. and Jas, M. (2019). MNE-BIDS: Organizing electrophysiological data into the BIDS format and facilitating their analysis. Journal of Open Source Software 4: (1896). https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01896\nNiso, G., Gorgolewski, K. J., Bock, E., Brooks, T. L., Flandin, G., Gramfort, A., Henson, R. N., Jas, M., Litvak, V., Moreau, J., Oostenveld, R., Schoffelen, J., Tadel, F., Wexler, J., Baillet, S. (2018). MEG-BIDS, the brain imaging data structure extended to magnetoencephalography. Scientific Data, 5, 180110. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2018.110","recording_modality":["meg"],"senior_author":"[(*) = equal contribution]","sessions":[],"size_bytes":82360041747,"source":"openneuro","study_design":null,"study_domain":null,"tasks":["CuedRecall"],"timestamps":{"digested_at":"2026-04-22T12:26:25.685406+00:00","dataset_created_at":"2022-09-23T17:53:03.124Z","dataset_modified_at":"2022-10-11T18:18:40.000Z"},"total_files":30,"storage":{"backend":"s3","base":"s3://openneuro.org/ds004278","raw_key":"dataset_description.json","dep_keys":["CHANGES","README","participants.json","participants.tsv"]},"tagger_meta":{"config_hash":"3557b68bca409f28","metadata_hash":"5f5d2d37af476cc2","model":"openai/gpt-5.2","tagged_at":"2026-04-07T09:32:40.872789+00:00"},"tags":{"pathology":["Healthy"],"modality":["Unknown"],"type":["Memory"],"confidence":{"pathology":0.7,"modality":0.4,"type":0.8},"reasoning":{"few_shot_analysis":"Most similar few-shot convention is the digit span dataset (Healthy/Auditory/Memory), where the key mapping is that an explicit memory paradigm in metadata (e.g., “digit span”, “memorized”) leads to Type=Memory, and Modality is determined by the stimulus channel (auditory digits there). Here, the paradigm is explicitly “Cued Recall”, which by the same convention maps to Type=Memory; however, the cue stimulus modality is not explicitly stated in the provided metadata, so Modality must rely on weaker inference (Visual vs Unknown). For Pathology, multiple few-shot examples show that when no clinical recruitment is stated and only demographics are given, Pathology=Healthy is used (e.g., bandit task: “Healthy control college students”; motor imagery volunteers).","metadata_analysis":"Key metadata indicates a memory recall paradigm with no clinical population specified. Quotes: (1) Title: \"Sustained Neural Representations of Personally Familiar People and Places During Cued Recall\" (strongly indicates cued recall / memory retrieval). (2) Tasks: \"CuedRecall\" (task name directly aligns with recall). (3) Participants: \"Subjects: 30; ... Age range: 21-35\" (demographics only; no diagnosis/clinical recruitment described). Also, the README provided contains only general references (MNE-BIDS, MEG-BIDS) and does not describe stimulus presentation modality.","paper_abstract_analysis":"No useful paper information.","evidence_alignment_check":"Pathology: Metadata says only demographics (\"Subjects: 30... Age range: 21-35\") and provides no disorder/diagnosis; few-shot pattern suggests labeling such non-clinical cohorts as Healthy. ALIGN.\nModality: Metadata does not state whether cues were visual (images/words) or auditory (spoken); few-shot pattern suggests choosing modality from explicit stimulus description, but none is present here. PARTIAL/UNCERTAIN—no direct conflict, just missing facts; therefore modality cannot be assigned with high confidence.\nType: Metadata says \"Cued Recall\" in the title and task name \"CuedRecall\"; few-shot pattern maps recall/memory paradigms to Type=Memory (as in digit span). ALIGN.","decision_summary":"Top-2 candidates per category:\n- Pathology: (1) Healthy—supported by absence of any clinical recruitment info plus demographics-only participant summary (\"Subjects: 30... Age range: 21-35\"). (2) Unknown—possible if population details were incomplete. Winner: Healthy (metadata supports a normative cohort; no contrary facts).\n- Modality: (1) Visual—common implementation for cued recall tasks (visual cues), but not explicitly stated. (2) Unknown—supported by the lack of any quoted stimulus-modality description in provided metadata. Winner: Unknown (insufficient explicit evidence for Visual/Auditory/etc.).\n- Type: (1) Memory—supported by title phrase \"During Cued Recall\" and task name \"CuedRecall\". (2) Other—if it were primarily about representational dynamics rather than memory, but recall framing dominates. Winner: Memory.\nConfidence justification: Pathology has no explicit 'healthy' statement but strong absence-of-pathology evidence (1 quote) => moderate. Modality has no quotes describing stimuli => low. Type has 2 explicit metadata indicators (title + task name) consistent with few-shot mapping => high-moderate."}},"nemar_citation_count":0,"computed_title":"Sustained Neural Representations of Personally Familiar People and Places During Cued Recall","nchans_counts":[{"val":306,"count":30}],"sfreq_counts":[{"val":1200.0,"count":30}],"stats_computed_at":"2026-04-22T23:16:00.307302+00:00","total_duration_s":55919.975,"canonical_name":null,"name_confidence":0.82,"name_meta":{"suggested_at":"2026-04-14T10:18:35.343Z","model":"openai/gpt-5.2 + openai/gpt-5.4-mini + deterministic_fallback"},"name_source":"author_year","author_year":"Kidder2022"}}