{"success":true,"database":"eegdash","data":{"_id":"6953f4249276ef1ee07a3391","dataset_id":"ds004843","associated_paper_doi":null,"authors":["Tony Johnson","Stephen Gordon","Jon Touryan","Kevin King"],"bids_version":"1.8.0","contact_info":["Kevin King"],"contributing_labs":null,"data_processed":false,"dataset_doi":"doi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004843.v1.0.0","datatypes":["eeg"],"demographics":{"subjects_count":14,"ages":[],"age_min":null,"age_max":null,"age_mean":null,"species":null,"sex_distribution":null,"handedness_distribution":null},"experimental_modalities":null,"external_links":{"source_url":"https://openneuro.org/datasets/ds004843","osf_url":null,"github_url":null,"paper_url":null},"funding":[],"ingestion_fingerprint":"8b27e62b0f55343b05e6301febb4e3b1459fea699d4cd2f03b5a77513303a968","license":"CC0","n_contributing_labs":null,"name":"T16","readme":"TX16 dataset","recording_modality":["eeg"],"senior_author":"Kevin King","sessions":[],"size_bytes":8229205347,"source":"openneuro","study_design":null,"study_domain":null,"tasks":["VisualSituationalAwareness"],"timestamps":{"digested_at":"2026-04-22T12:27:02.879591+00:00","dataset_created_at":"2023-11-13T18:52:00.054Z","dataset_modified_at":"2023-11-13T19:01:24.000Z"},"total_files":92,"storage":{"backend":"s3","base":"s3://openneuro.org/ds004843","raw_key":"dataset_description.json","dep_keys":["CHANGES","README","participants.tsv","task-VisualSituationalAwareness_events.json"]},"nemar_citation_count":0,"computed_title":"T16","nchans_counts":[{"val":70,"count":92}],"sfreq_counts":[{"val":256.0,"count":92}],"stats_computed_at":"2026-04-22T23:16:00.308513+00:00","tags":{"pathology":["Healthy"],"modality":["Visual"],"type":["Attention"],"confidence":{"pathology":0.6,"modality":0.7,"type":0.6},"reasoning":{"few_shot_analysis":"Closest few-shot by paradigm/style is the DPX visual cognitive control/attention example (\"EEG: DPX Cog Ctl Task in Acute Mild TBI\"), which maps a visually cued task probing vigilance/cognitive control to Modality=Visual and Type=Attention. Although that few-shot is in a TBI clinical cohort, it provides the convention that visually presented, situational monitoring paradigms are labeled under Visual (modality) and Attention (type) when the construct is sustained monitoring/awareness rather than pure perception or motor execution.","metadata_analysis":"Key available metadata is sparse. The dataset specifies (1) task name: \"VisualSituationalAwareness\" and (2) participant count without any diagnosis/grouping: \"Subjects: 14\". Additionally, the dataset has only minimal description: \"TX16 dataset\" and a short title \"T16\" with no mention of any clinical recruitment or intervention.","paper_abstract_analysis":"No useful paper information.","evidence_alignment_check":"Pathology: Metadata says only \"Subjects: 14\" (no diagnosis/clinical terms). Few-shot pattern suggests that when no disorder is mentioned, label as Healthy. ALIGN (no conflict; inference only).\nModality: Metadata explicitly says task \"VisualSituationalAwareness\" (contains 'Visual'). Few-shot convention maps visually presented tasks to Modality=Visual. ALIGN.\nType: Metadata indicates \"VisualSituationalAwareness\" (situational awareness is typically operationalized as sustained monitoring/attentional state). Few-shot convention (e.g., visual cognitive control/monitoring paradigms) maps to Type=Attention rather than Perception. ALIGN (though metadata is underspecified about exact construct).","decision_summary":"Pathology top-2: (1) Healthy—supported by absence of any stated disorder and only a generic participant count (\"Subjects: 14\"); (2) Unknown—also plausible due to lack of explicit screening/health statement. Winner: Healthy (catalog convention when no clinical recruitment is indicated).\nModality top-2: (1) Visual—explicit in task name \"VisualSituationalAwareness\"; (2) Unknown/Other—only if task name were misleading. Winner: Visual.\nType top-2: (1) Attention—\"SituationalAwareness\" most directly aligns with vigilance/monitoring/attentional state; (2) Other—if the task were more complex (e.g., multi-construct simulation) but not described. Winner: Attention.\nConfidence justification: Pathology has no explicit health/control statement (inference only). Modality has an explicit keyword ('Visual') in the task name. Type is inferred from task naming with no additional description."}},"source_url":"https://openneuro.org/datasets/ds004843","total_duration_s":104391.0,"tagger_meta":{"config_hash":"3557b68bca409f28","metadata_hash":"983ff283cbe1f743","model":"openai/gpt-5.2","tagged_at":"2026-04-07T09:32:40.872789+00:00"},"author_year":"Johnson2023_T16","canonical_name":null}}