{"success":true,"database":"eegdash","data":{"_id":"6953f4249276ef1ee07a3426","dataset_id":"ds005930","associated_paper_doi":"10.1117/1.NPh.10.2.025007","authors":["Yuanyuan Gao","De'Ja Rogers","Alexander von Lühmann","Antonio Ortega-Martinez","David A. Boas","Meryem A. Yücel"],"bids_version":"1.8.0","contact_info":["MERYEM YUCEL"],"contributing_labs":null,"data_processed":false,"dataset_doi":"doi:10.18112/openneuro.ds005930.v1.0.1","datatypes":["fnirs"],"demographics":{"subjects_count":12,"ages":[],"age_min":null,"age_max":null,"age_mean":null,"species":null,"sex_distribution":null,"handedness_distribution":null},"experimental_modalities":null,"external_links":{"paper_url":"https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/journals/neurophotonics/volume-10/issue-2/025007/Short-separation-regression-incorporated-diffuse-optical-tomography-image-reconstruction-modeling/10.1117/1.NPh.10.2.025007.pdf"},"funding":["NIH BRAIN Initiative (Grant No. 1U01EB029856-01)"],"ingestion_fingerprint":"8d0a6efb4d0103c24c8d2e027978bccae27e7f786ccfd6d5dc45a1d5c04e8752","license":"CC0","n_contributing_labs":null,"name":"BallSqueezingHD_Gao2023","readme":null,"recording_modality":["fnirs"],"senior_author":"Meryem A. Yücel","sessions":[],"size_bytes":319015113,"source":"openneuro","study_design":null,"study_domain":null,"tasks":["BallSqueezing"],"timestamps":{"digested_at":"2026-04-22T12:28:59.824213+00:00","dataset_created_at":"2025-02-17T17:54:06.518Z","dataset_modified_at":"2025-07-08T21:33:25.000Z"},"total_files":36,"storage":{"backend":"s3","base":"s3://openneuro.org/ds005930","raw_key":"dataset_description.json","dep_keys":["CHANGES","participants.tsv"]},"tagger_meta":{"model":"gpt-6-sol","taxonomy":"v2","config_hash":"39931253008fe2df","tagged_at":"2026-10-06T13:13:11Z","source":"eegdash-llm-tagger"},"tags":{"pathology":["Healthy"],"modality":["No stimulus"],"type":["Motor"],"confidence":{"pathology":0.6,"modality":0.6,"type":0.8},"reasoning":{"few_shot_analysis":"The EEG Motor Movement/Imagery example maps movement tasks to Motor. Its Visual modality depends on an explicitly described target appearing on a screen; that cue cannot be assumed here. The resting-state examples support No stimulus only when recordings lack an external stimulus.","metadata_analysis":"The task list names \"BallSqueezing,\" and the abstract describes \"data acquired during a ball squeezing task.\" The participants overview says only \"Subjects: 12\"; it gives no diagnosis or recruitment criteria. Neither the task list nor the abstract describes a sensory cue.","paper_abstract_analysis":"The abstract confirms that ball squeezing supplied task data for benchmarking fNIRS reconstruction. Its reference to \"fNIRS resting state data augmented with synthetic brain response\" describes a separate benchmarking input and does not establish that these 12 subjects' ball-squeezing recordings were resting-state recordings. It does not specify how squeezing was cued.","evidence_alignment_check":"Pathology: Metadata says \"Subjects: 12\" but names no condition. Few-shot normative-task examples suggest Healthy; they align insofar as neither identifies a clinical cohort, but health status is not explicit. Modality: Metadata says \"ball squeezing task\" and gives no sensory stimulus. The motor example suggests Visual only when screen targets are stated, so there is no factual conflict; without a documented cue, No stimulus is the stronger inference. Type: Metadata says \"BallSqueezing\" and \"data acquired during a ball squeezing task.\" The motor example suggests Motor, and they align. No metadata fact is overridden by a demonstration pattern.","decision_summary":"Pathology—Healthy versus Unknown: no diagnosis is reported, favoring Healthy for an apparently normative cohort, but \"Subjects: 12\" provides no direct health evidence; confidence 0.6. Modality—No stimulus versus Visual: no external cue is documented, whereas Visual would require an unstated cue; confidence 0.6, based on context rather than a direct statement that cues were absent. Type—Motor versus Other: \"BallSqueezing\" and \"data acquired during a ball squeezing task\" directly identify movement execution, favoring Motor despite the paper's methodological fNIRS aim; confidence 0.8 based on these two explicit phrases and the motor-task few-shot analog."}},"computed_title":"BallSqueezingHD_Gao2023","nchans_counts":[{"val":200,"count":36}],"sfreq_counts":[{"val":8.719308035714286,"count":36}],"stats_computed_at":"2026-04-22T23:16:00.311098+00:00","total_duration_s":null,"canonical_name":null,"name_confidence":0.74,"name_meta":{"suggested_at":"2026-04-14T10:18:35.343Z","model":"openai/gpt-5.2 + openai/gpt-5.4-mini + deterministic_fallback"},"name_source":"author_year","author_year":"Gao2023","associated_paper_meta":{"channel":"web_search","confidence":"high","author_overlap":4,"is_oa":true,"oa_status":"gold","source":"paper_resolver","method":"web_search","match_evidence":"Gao; Rogers; von Luhmann; Ortega-Martinez"}}}