{"success":true,"database":"eegdash","data":{"_id":"6953f4249276ef1ee07a3429","dataset_id":"ds005935","associated_paper_doi":null,"authors":["Xinge Li","Manon A. Krol","Sahar Jahani","David A. Boas","Helen Tager-Flusberg","Meryem A. Yücel"],"bids_version":"1.8.0","contact_info":["MERYEM YUCEL"],"contributing_labs":null,"data_processed":false,"dataset_doi":"doi:10.18112/openneuro.ds005935.v1.0.0","datatypes":["fnirs"],"demographics":{"subjects_count":21,"ages":[],"age_min":null,"age_max":null,"age_mean":null,"species":null,"sex_distribution":null,"handedness_distribution":null},"experimental_modalities":null,"external_links":{"source_url":"https://openneuro.org/datasets/ds005935","osf_url":null,"github_url":null,"paper_url":null},"funding":["National Institutes of Health (P41EB015896, P01-HD064653, NICHD-PO1 HD 64653)"],"ingestion_fingerprint":"745252030d0856bebf3653e554ed7b3aa4714da416ec551649719147c09c3b78","license":"CC0","n_contributing_labs":null,"name":"Mirror Neuron Study","readme":null,"recording_modality":["fnirs"],"senior_author":"Meryem A. Yücel","sessions":["01"],"size_bytes":774469713,"source":"openneuro","study_design":null,"study_domain":null,"tasks":["MirrorNeuron"],"timestamps":{"digested_at":"2026-04-22T12:29:00.291801+00:00","dataset_created_at":"2025-02-19T18:53:29.044Z","dataset_modified_at":"2025-02-19T20:34:36.000Z"},"total_files":64,"storage":{"backend":"s3","base":"s3://openneuro.org/ds005935","raw_key":"dataset_description.json","dep_keys":["CHANGES","participants.tsv"]},"tagger_meta":{"config_hash":"3557b68bca409f28","metadata_hash":"b241be390ff73109","model":"openai/gpt-5.2","tagged_at":"2026-04-07T09:32:40.872789+00:00"},"tags":{"pathology":["Unknown"],"modality":["Visual"],"type":["Motor"],"confidence":{"pathology":0.4,"modality":0.6,"type":0.6},"reasoning":{"few_shot_analysis":"Most similar few-shot example by construct is the “EEG Motor Movement/Imagery Dataset” (labeled Type=“Motor”, Modality=“Visual”), where visual on-screen cues drive motor-related brain activity. A “Mirror Neuron” paradigm is typically centered on the motor system (action execution/observation, imitation), so by convention it maps most naturally to Type=“Motor”. However, unlike the few-shot motor example, this dataset’s metadata does not explicitly describe the stimulus channel (e.g., videos, sounds) or participant actions, so modality can only be inferred weakly.","metadata_analysis":"Available metadata is extremely sparse. Key snippets: (1) Title: \"Mirror Neuron Study\". (2) Task label: \"MirrorNeuron\" (tasks: [\"MirrorNeuron\"]). (3) Participants summary: \"Subjects: 21\". There is no explicit statement about diagnosis/clinical recruitment, no task description (stimuli/actions), and no events information.","paper_abstract_analysis":"No useful paper information.","evidence_alignment_check":"Pathology: Metadata says nothing about a clinical population (only \"Subjects: 21\"); few-shot patterns cannot override missing facts → no conflict; result remains non-committal.\nModality: Metadata does not state stimulus type; few-shot conventions for motor/action paradigms often involve visual cues (e.g., motor/imagery example) → pattern suggests Visual, but this is not confirmed by metadata (weak alignment; inference only).\nType: Metadata provides only \"MirrorNeuron\"/\"Mirror Neuron Study\"; few-shot conventions suggest labeling by construct (motor/action system) rather than mechanics → suggests Motor; metadata is consistent with that interpretation but does not explicitly confirm action observation/execution (partial alignment; inference).","decision_summary":"Top-2 candidates per category:\n- Pathology: (1) Unknown — supported by lack of any diagnosis/recruitment info (\"Subjects: 21\"). (2) Healthy — plausible default for non-clinical studies, but not stated. चयन: Unknown. Evidence alignment: N/A (insufficient metadata).\n- Modality: (1) Visual — inferred from typical mirror-neuron/action-observation paradigms and few-shot motor example convention (Motor tasks often visually cued). (2) Unknown — because no stimulus channel is described (only \"MirrorNeuron\"). चयन: Visual (inference). Evidence alignment: weak/uncertain.\n- Type: (1) Motor — mirror neuron construct most closely tied to action/motor system; consistent with few-shot convention for motor-related paradigms. (2) Other — if the study is primarily social cognition without explicit motor focus (not described). चयन: Motor (inference from title/task name). Evidence alignment: partial.\nConfidence justification: Pathology low because zero explicit diagnostic quotes; Modality/Type moderate-low because only the title/task name supports inference (no explicit stimulus/task description)."}},"computed_title":"Mirror Neuron Study","nchans_counts":[{"val":120,"count":64}],"sfreq_counts":[{"val":25.0,"count":63},{"val":25.000000000000004,"count":1}],"stats_computed_at":"2026-04-22T23:16:00.311134+00:00","total_duration_s":null,"canonical_name":null,"name_confidence":0.62,"name_meta":{"suggested_at":"2026-04-14T10:18:35.343Z","model":"openai/gpt-5.2 + openai/gpt-5.4-mini + deterministic_fallback"},"name_source":"author_year","author_year":"Li2025"}}