{"success":true,"database":"eegdash","data":{"_id":"6953f4249276ef1ee07a3446","dataset_id":"ds006370","associated_paper_doi":null,"authors":["X"],"bids_version":"v1.2.1","contact_info":["Nursena Ataseven"],"contributing_labs":null,"data_processed":false,"dataset_doi":"doi:10.18112/openneuro.ds006370.v1.0.1","datatypes":["eeg"],"demographics":{"subjects_count":56,"ages":[],"age_min":null,"age_max":null,"age_mean":null,"species":null,"sex_distribution":null,"handedness_distribution":null},"experimental_modalities":null,"external_links":{"source_url":"https://openneuro.org/datasets/ds006370","osf_url":null,"github_url":null,"paper_url":null},"funding":[],"ingestion_fingerprint":"a3cdc70d4dbbcc4d134be92951bb6c964e90b185a0db7787a0a3214b719de11f","license":"CC0","n_contributing_labs":null,"name":"Memory Reactivation Levels Remain Unaffected by Anticipated Interference Experiment 2 Dataset","readme":"Each trial began with a space key press, followed by a\nfixation dot for 500–650 ms. Then, 2 or 6 lateral objects appeared\nfor 1250 ms. A central cue indicated which object(s) to memorize.\nThe other side had irrelevant objects for visual balance. After a\n1000 ms delay, half the blocks showed 4 distractors (dual task),\nwhere participants identified a same-category object among them.\nThe other half showed only fixation (single task). A colored dot gave\nfeedback on dual task accuracy. Then, a probe showed 2\nobjects, and participants selected the cued one using arrow keys.\nFeedback followed, showing the correct object with colored cues.\nThe preprocessing steps to reach this dataset is explained\nin the following preprint and the mentioned OSF repository\nxx (Experiment 2)","recording_modality":["eeg"],"senior_author":"X","sessions":[],"size_bytes":43035741246,"source":"openneuro","study_design":null,"study_domain":null,"tasks":["DelayedMatchtoSampleTask"],"timestamps":{"digested_at":"2026-04-22T12:29:19.073980+00:00","dataset_created_at":"2025-06-18T14:43:36.575Z","dataset_modified_at":"2025-06-25T11:53:45.000Z"},"total_files":56,"storage":{"backend":"s3","base":"s3://openneuro.org/ds006370","raw_key":"dataset_description.json","dep_keys":["CHANGES","README","participants.tsv","task-DelayedMatchtoSampleTask_events.json"]},"tagger_meta":{"config_hash":"4a051be509a0e3d0","metadata_hash":"b641cca697e7967b","model":"openai/gpt-5.2","tagged_at":"2026-01-20T18:56:14.889843+00:00"},"tags":{"pathology":["Healthy"],"modality":["Visual"],"type":["Memory"],"confidence":{"pathology":0.6,"modality":0.8,"type":0.8},"reasoning":{"few_shot_analysis":"Most similar few-shot convention is the digit-span dataset (Healthy / Auditory / Memory): it labels a paradigm whose primary goal is maintaining information over a delay and later selecting/recalling it as Type=Memory. The target dataset likewise has an explicit encode–delay–probe structure with distractors, so by the same convention it maps to Type=Memory (rather than Perception). For modality, multiple few-shot examples show that when stimuli are on-screen objects/dots, Modality=Visual (e.g., visual discrimination and motor-imagery tasks both use visual cues but are still labeled Visual for stimulus channel).","metadata_analysis":"Key task facts from the provided README indicate a visual working-memory paradigm with an added distractor/dual-task manipulation:\n- Visual stimuli: \"2 or 6 lateral objects appeared for 1250 ms\" and \"a probe showed 2 objects\".\n- Memory requirement: \"A central cue indicated which object(s) to memorize\" and \"participants selected the cued one\".\n- Delay / maintenance and distraction: \"After a 1000 ms delay\" and \"half the blocks showed 4 distractors (dual task)\".\nNo participant diagnosis/clinical recruitment information is stated in the metadata snippet provided.","paper_abstract_analysis":"No useful paper information.","evidence_alignment_check":"Pathology:\n1) Metadata says: no diagnosis or clinical group is mentioned (no quoted pathology terms present).\n2) Few-shot pattern suggests: when no clinical population is specified, datasets are typically labeled Healthy.\n3) Alignment: PARTIAL (metadata is silent; few-shot guides default).\n4) Resolution: assign Healthy due to lack of any stated clinical recruitment.\n\nModality:\n1) Metadata says: \"lateral objects appeared\" and \"fixation dot\" and \"probe showed 2 objects\" (screen-based visual items).\n2) Few-shot pattern suggests: object/dot stimuli on a screen map to Visual.\n3) Alignment: ALIGN.\n\nType:\n1) Metadata says: \"cue indicated which object(s) to memorize\" + \"After a 1000 ms delay\" + \"probe showed 2 objects\".\n2) Few-shot pattern suggests: encode/maintain/probe paradigms are labeled Memory (e.g., digit span example).\n3) Alignment: ALIGN.","decision_summary":"Pathology top-2: (1) Healthy vs (2) Unknown. Evidence: metadata contains no clinical terms; by catalog convention, absence of pathology-specific recruitment defaults to Healthy. Final=Healthy. Confidence=0.6 because this is a default inference with no explicit participant description.\n\nModality top-2: (1) Visual vs (2) Multisensory. Visual is supported by explicit on-screen stimuli: \"fixation dot\", \"lateral objects\", \"probe showed 2 objects\"; no auditory/tactile stimuli described. Final=Visual. Confidence=0.8 (2+ direct stimulus quotes).\n\nType top-2: (1) Memory vs (2) Attention. Memory is strongly supported by explicit instruction to memorize and a delayed probe/recognition: \"indicated which object(s) to memorize\", \"1000 ms delay\", \"probe showed 2 objects\". Attention is a runner-up because of \"distractors (dual task)\", but it appears as a manipulation within a working-memory task rather than the primary construct. Final=Memory. Confidence=0.8 (multiple explicit memory-structure quotes + strong few-shot analog)."}},"computed_title":"Memory Reactivation Levels Remain Unaffected by Anticipated Interference Experiment 2 Dataset","nchans_counts":[{"val":30,"count":56}],"sfreq_counts":[{"val":1000.0,"count":56}],"stats_computed_at":"2026-04-22T23:16:00.311517+00:00","total_duration_s":343162.65,"author_year":"DS6370_Memory_Reactivation","canonical_name":null}}