{"success":true,"database":"eegdash","data":{"_id":"6953f4249276ef1ee07a344c","dataset_id":"ds006437","associated_paper_doi":null,"authors":["anonymous"],"bids_version":"v1.10.0","contact_info":["Enrique Carrillosulub"],"contributing_labs":null,"data_processed":false,"dataset_doi":"doi:10.18112/openneuro.ds006437.v1.1.0","datatypes":["eeg"],"demographics":{"subjects_count":9,"ages":[52,66,53,62,32,38,60,25,35],"age_min":25,"age_max":66,"age_mean":47.0,"species":null,"sex_distribution":{"f":8,"m":1},"handedness_distribution":null},"experimental_modalities":null,"external_links":{"source_url":"https://openneuro.org/datasets/ds006437","osf_url":null,"github_url":null,"paper_url":null},"funding":[],"ingestion_fingerprint":"68a79871e21e177093a9a0825b0a892edf85291db7dfe117293c34c12d0cef73","license":"CC0","n_contributing_labs":null,"name":"LIGHT Hypnotherapy","readme":"LIGHT Dataset\nDuring these guided imagery hypnotherapy sessions,\na hypnotherapist integrates storytelling and deep\nvisualizations techniques to encourage personal\nand wellbeing. This method allows individuals to\nexplore and modify their subconscious narratives, in\norder to foster changes that resonate through their\nlives. This differs from traditional hypnotherapy\nby tapping into eudaemonic aspects of well-being,\nemphasizing the pursuit of meaning and self\nrealization.\n2 weeks before the first session, they will come to\nthe lab to record baseline resting EEG (session 0).\nWith the exception of sessions 1, 4, and 8, all LIGHT\nsessions were performed virtually. For sessions 1,\n4, and 8, EEG and ECG data was collected.\nThe first phase of each session was guided relaxation\nor induction followed by prompts to visualize a\nperfect place of comfort and safely in ones creative\nimagination. Next, they were prompted to visualize\na path or a set of stairs, and asked to walk down\nthat path or stairway for ten steps, counting down\nfrom 10 to 1 outloud. They were guided to visualize\nand describe a chair or seat, followed by a crown.\nAfter taking a seat in their imagined chair and\nputting on the crown, they were encouraged to pause\nand observe the world they had conjured. Following\nthis brief period of reflection, awareness was drawn\nto a light or color that emerged from their creative\nmind. They identified the color of the light and\nwere instructed to imagine that light entering and\ntraveling through their body, filling up each cell\nas it passed through. The participant was instructed\nto leave a mental bookmark in this place so that\nthey could come back to it at any time, before\nremoving and storing their crown. At the end of the\nLIGHT sessions, the participant was asked to rise\nfrom their imagined chair or throne and count their\nway up from one to ten, with the session ending as\nthe participant returned to an awake and alert state\nat the end of the ten count.\nBaseline recordings were 5 minute of length.\nHypnotherapy recordings are variable in length with\nmultiple events indicating a hypnotherapist phase\ntransitions.","recording_modality":["eeg"],"senior_author":"anonymous","sessions":["0","1","4","8"],"size_bytes":4631684039,"source":"openneuro","study_design":null,"study_domain":null,"tasks":["baseline0","baseline1","baseline4","baseline8","hypnotherapy"],"timestamps":{"digested_at":"2026-04-22T12:29:27.474309+00:00","dataset_created_at":"2025-07-02T02:03:55.684Z","dataset_modified_at":"2025-08-21T17:34:41.000Z"},"total_files":63,"storage":{"backend":"s3","base":"s3://openneuro.org/ds006437","raw_key":"dataset_description.json","dep_keys":["CHANGES","README","participants.json","participants.tsv","task-hypnotherapy_events.json"]},"tagger_meta":{"config_hash":"4a051be509a0e3d0","metadata_hash":"3c43081701066497","model":"openai/gpt-5.2","tagged_at":"2026-01-20T18:58:26.189436+00:00"},"tags":{"pathology":["Healthy"],"modality":["Auditory"],"type":["Clinical/Intervention"],"confidence":{"pathology":0.6,"modality":0.7,"type":0.75},"reasoning":{"few_shot_analysis":"No few-shot example is an exact match for guided imagery/hypnotherapy. For labeling conventions: (1) the Parkinson's \"Cross-modal Oddball Task\" example shows that when the dataset is centered on a clinical-style intervention/cohort aim, the Type can be labeled \"Clinical/Intervention\" even though there is a task; (2) the sleep-deprivation resting-state example shows that a baseline resting recording alone would map to \"Resting State\" modality and \"Resting-state\" type, but this LIGHT dataset includes structured, therapist-guided session phases beyond baseline. Thus, by convention, we prioritize the dominant experimental content (guided hypnotherapy session) over the presence of a baseline resting recording when choosing Modality/Type.","metadata_analysis":"Key facts from the provided README: (1) intervention-like paradigm: \"During these guided imagery hypnotherapy sessions, a hypnotherapist integrates storytelling and deep visualizations techniques\" and \"The first phase of each session was guided relaxation or induction followed by prompts to visualize...\"; (2) presence of baseline rest: \"2 weeks before the first session, they will come to the lab to record baseline resting EEG (session 0).\" and \"Baseline recordings were 5 minute of length.\"; (3) participant population/diagnosis is not stated anywhere in the README (no mention of patients, disorder labels, or recruitment based on a diagnosis).","paper_abstract_analysis":"No useful paper information.","evidence_alignment_check":"Pathology: Metadata SAYS no diagnosis/clinical recruitment is specified (e.g., only \"guided imagery hypnotherapy\" and \"baseline resting EEG\" are described, with no patient labels). Few-shot pattern SUGGESTS using \"Healthy\" when there is no disorder focus (e.g., multiple healthy cognitive datasets), otherwise \"Unknown\" if population is not stated. ALIGN/CONFLICT: partial ambiguity (metadata silent); choose \"Healthy\" by convention but with limited confidence.\n\nModality: Metadata SAYS the session is therapist guided via \"storytelling\" and \"prompts\" (auditory/verbal guidance): \"a hypnotherapist integrates storytelling\" and \"prompted to visualize... counting down... outloud.\" Few-shot pattern SUGGESTS labeling modality by stimulus channel (e.g., oddball examples map to Auditory/Visual based on cues), not by response. ALIGN: aligns with \"Auditory\" as the dominant external stimulus modality (even though imagery content is visual internally and a baseline rest exists).\n\nType: Metadata SAYS this is a hypnotherapy/wellbeing intervention paradigm: \"guided imagery hypnotherapy sessions\" aiming to \"encourage personal and wellbeing\" and \"foster changes\". Few-shot pattern SUGGESTS that intervention/clinical-purpose datasets map to \"Clinical/Intervention\" (e.g., Parkinson's cohort cognitive dysfunction study; dementia dataset as clinical characterization). ALIGN: aligns best with \"Clinical/Intervention\" rather than pure \"Resting-state\" or a basic cognitive task label.","decision_summary":"Pathology top-2: (A) Healthy — evidence: no disorder recruitment mentioned anywhere; context is wellbeing/hypnotherapy rather than a named diagnosis. (B) Unknown — evidence: participants are not explicitly labeled \"healthy\" or \"controls\". Head-to-head: choose Healthy because there is no clinical condition stated and the dataset reads like a normative/volunteer intervention study; however metadata silence keeps confidence moderate.\n\nModality top-2: (A) Auditory — evidence: \"hypnotherapist integrates storytelling\"; \"prompts to visualize\" and verbal counting \"outloud\" indicate spoken guidance as the primary external stimulus. (B) Resting State — evidence: \"baseline resting EEG (session 0)\" and \"Baseline recordings were 5 minute\". Head-to-head: choose Auditory because the main sessions are guided (not purely rest) and baseline rest is ancillary.\n\nType top-2: (A) Clinical/Intervention — evidence: \"guided imagery hypnotherapy sessions\"; goal to \"encourage personal and wellbeing\" and \"foster changes\"; repeated multi-session structure (sessions 1,4,8) suggests an intervention protocol. (B) Affect — evidence: explicit wellbeing/eudaemonic framing could be interpreted as affect/wellbeing research. Head-to-head: choose Clinical/Intervention because the dataset is organized around a therapeutic procedure (hypnotherapy sessions with phase transitions), not merely affective stimulus presentation."}},"computed_title":"LIGHT Hypnotherapy","nchans_counts":[{"val":64,"count":63}],"sfreq_counts":[{"val":256.0,"count":63}],"stats_computed_at":"2026-04-22T23:16:00.311578+00:00","total_duration_s":60472.93359375,"author_year":"DS6437_LIGHT_Hypnotherapy","canonical_name":null}}