{"success":true,"database":"eegdash","data":{"_id":"6953f4249276ef1ee07a3453","dataset_id":"ds006480","associated_paper_doi":null,"authors":["Andy Jeesu Kim","Mara Mather","Santiago Morales","Joshua Senior"],"bids_version":"1.8.0","contact_info":["Andy Jeesu Kim"],"contributing_labs":null,"data_processed":false,"dataset_doi":"doi:10.18112/openneuro.ds006480.v1.0.1","datatypes":["eeg"],"demographics":{"subjects_count":68,"ages":[],"age_min":null,"age_max":null,"age_mean":null,"species":null,"sex_distribution":null,"handedness_distribution":null},"experimental_modalities":null,"external_links":{"source_url":"https://openneuro.org/datasets/ds006480","osf_url":null,"github_url":null,"paper_url":null},"funding":[],"ingestion_fingerprint":"9f5d3f69346ba15dcb533bf17d25afe309265fd926b1c887396d172f3475f2e8","license":"CC0","n_contributing_labs":null,"name":"Young Adult Resting State and Auditory Oddball Task EEG Data","readme":"# Young Adult Resting State and Auditory Oddball Task EEG Data\n## What is included\n- This dataset includes resting state and auditory oddball task EEG data for two conditions: control and arousal (under threat of unpredictable shock).\n## Event labels\n100 - 5 minutes eyes open resting, control condition, begin\n101 - 5 minutes eyes open resting, control condition, end\n102 - 5 minutes eyes closed resting, control condition, begin\n103 - 5 minutes eyes closed resting, control condition, end\n104 - passive auditory oddball task, control condition, run begin\n105 - passive auditory oddball task, control condition, trial start\n106 - passive auditory oddball task, control condition, standard tone\n107 - passive auditory oddball task, control condition, target tone\n108 - passive auditory oddball task, control condition, distractor tone\n109 - passive auditory oddball task, control condition, trial end\n110 - passive auditory oddball task, control condition, run end\n111 - active auditory oddball task, control condition, run begin\n112 - active auditory oddball task, control condition, trial start\n113 - active auditory oddball task, control condition, standard tone\n114 - active auditory oddball task, control condition, target tone\n115 - active auditory oddball task, control condition, distractor tone\n116 - active auditory oddball task, control condition, start of response period\n117 - active auditory oddball task, control condition, manual button response recorded\n118 - active auditory oddball task, control condition, run end\n119 - 5 minutes eyes open resting, shock condition, begin\n120 - 5 minutes eyes open resting, shock condition, end\n121 - 5 minutes eyes closed resting, shock condition, begin\n122 - 5 minutes eyes closed resting, shock condition, end\n123 - passive auditory oddball task, shock condition, run begin\n124 - passive auditory oddball task, shock condition, trial start\n125 - passive auditory oddball task, shock condition, standard tone\n126 - passive auditory oddball task, shock condition, target tone\n127 - passive auditory oddball task, shock condition, distractor tone\n128 - passive auditory oddball task, shock condition, trial end\n129 - passive auditory oddball task, shock condition, run end\n130 - active auditory oddball task, shock condition, run begin\n131 - active auditory oddball task, shock condition, trial start\n132 - active auditory oddball task, shock condition, standard tone\n133 - active auditory oddball task, shock condition, target tone\n134 - active auditory oddball task, shock condition, distractor tone\n135 - active auditory oddball task, shock condition, start of response period\n136 - active auditory oddball task, shock condition, manual button response recorded\n137 - active auditory oddball task, shock condition, run end\n## Citations\nNashiro, K., Yoo, H. J., Cho, C., Kim, A. J., Nasseri, P., Min, J., ... & Mather, M. (2024). Heart rate and breathing effects on attention and memory (HeartBEAM): Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial in older adults. Trials, 25(1), 190.\nKim, A. J., Morales, S., Senior, J., & Mather, M. (2025). Electroencephalography, pupillometry, and behavioral evidence for locus coeruleus-noradrenaline system related tonic hyperactivity in older adults. Preprint: doi.org/10.1101/2025.10.02.680040","recording_modality":["eeg"],"senior_author":"Joshua Senior","sessions":[],"size_bytes":68786099468,"source":"openneuro","study_design":null,"study_domain":null,"tasks":["oddball"],"timestamps":{"digested_at":"2026-04-22T12:29:30.985459+00:00","dataset_created_at":"2025-07-18T06:46:14.790Z","dataset_modified_at":"2025-10-06T17:43:35.000Z"},"total_files":68,"storage":{"backend":"s3","base":"s3://openneuro.org/ds006480","raw_key":"dataset_description.json","dep_keys":["CHANGES","README","task-oddball_events.json"]},"tagger_meta":{"config_hash":"4a051be509a0e3d0","metadata_hash":"736d74a68d91945d","model":"openai/gpt-5.2","tagged_at":"2026-01-20T19:01:11.403050+00:00"},"tags":{"pathology":["Healthy"],"modality":["Auditory"],"type":["Attention"],"confidence":{"pathology":0.7,"modality":0.8,"type":0.7},"reasoning":{"few_shot_analysis":"Most similar few-shot paradigms are the oddball datasets: (1) \"Cross-modal Oddball Task\" (Parkinson's; Modality=Multisensory; Type=Clinical/Intervention) and (2) \"EEG: Three-Stim Auditory Oddball and Rest in Acute and Chronic TBI\" (TBI; Modality=Auditory; Type=Decision-making). These examples guide the convention that (a) oddball tone paradigms map to an Auditory (or Multisensory if explicitly both) stimulus Modality, and (b) the Pathology label follows the recruited clinical group when present; otherwise datasets with non-clinical participants are labeled Healthy. Unlike those examples, the current dataset is not described as a clinical cohort; it also includes resting-state alongside oddball, similar to the TBI example which mixed oddball + rest.","metadata_analysis":"Key task/stimulus facts in the README include: (1) \"resting state and auditory oddball task EEG data\" indicating a mix of rest plus an auditory ERP paradigm; (2) explicit auditory stimulus event labels such as \"standard tone\", \"target tone\", and \"distractor tone\" (e.g., \"106 - passive auditory oddball task... standard tone\", \"107 ... target tone\", \"108 ... distractor tone\"); and (3) an affect/arousal manipulation: \"two conditions: control and arousal (under threat of unpredictable shock).\" No metadata line explicitly states a clinical diagnosis or patient group; the title specifies \"Young Adult\" rather than any disorder group.","paper_abstract_analysis":"No useful paper information.","evidence_alignment_check":"Pathology: Metadata SAYS no disorder/patient recruitment is stated (e.g., \"Young Adult\"; no diagnoses mentioned). Few-shot pattern SUGGESTS labeling clinical cohorts by diagnosis when stated (e.g., Parkinson's, TBI) and otherwise Healthy. ALIGN.\nModality: Metadata SAYS \"auditory oddball task\" with tones (\"standard tone\", \"target tone\", \"distractor tone\") plus resting state. Few-shot pattern SUGGESTS oddball-with-tones => Auditory modality (or Multisensory if explicitly both), as in the TBI and PD oddball examples. ALIGN (choose Auditory as the dominant stimulus modality; resting-state segments have no external sensory stimulus).\nType: Metadata SAYS oddball target detection with passive/active runs and responses (e.g., \"active auditory oddball task\" and \"manual button response recorded\") under a threat/arousal manipulation. Few-shot pattern SUGGESTS oddball tasks are often treated as cognitive control/target detection paradigms (the TBI oddball example was labeled Decision-making; the PD oddball example was labeled Clinical/Intervention because pathology was central). PARTIAL ALIGN: this dataset is healthy and the task mechanics most directly probe attention/target detection rather than clinical intervention; thus Attention is preferred over Clinical/Intervention, and over Decision-making unless decision policy/value is emphasized (not stated here).","decision_summary":"Top-2 candidates per category:\nPathology: (1) Healthy — supported by lack of any diagnosis/patient wording and the generic cohort label \"Young Adult\"; (2) Unknown — possible if cohort health status were unclear, but no clinical recruitment is indicated. Final: Healthy. (Alignment: aligns with few-shot convention that non-clinical cohorts map to Healthy.)\nModality: (1) Auditory — supported by \"auditory oddball task\" and multiple tone event labels (\"standard tone\", \"target tone\", \"distractor tone\"); (2) Resting State — because 5-min eyes open/closed resting blocks are included. Final: Auditory because the only explicit stimulus modality is auditory tones, whereas resting has no stimulus. \nType: (1) Attention — supported by oddball target/distractor structure and active responses (\"target tone\", \"distractor tone\", \"manual button response recorded\"), consistent with attentional orienting/target detection; (2) Affect — because manipulation is \"arousal (under threat of unpredictable shock)\". Final: Attention (the paradigm is primarily an oddball attentional task, with arousal as a condition manipulation rather than the sole construct description). Confidence reflects that the dataset includes both resting and threat/arousal, making Affect a plausible runner-up."}},"computed_title":"Young Adult Resting State and Auditory Oddball Task EEG Data","nchans_counts":[{"val":65,"count":68}],"sfreq_counts":[{"val":1000.0,"count":68}],"stats_computed_at":"2026-04-22T23:16:00.311672+00:00","total_duration_s":257997.332,"author_year":"Kim2025_Young_Adult_Resting","canonical_name":null}}