{"success":true,"database":"eegdash","data":{"_id":"6953f4249276ef1ee07a3465","dataset_id":"ds006768","associated_paper_doi":null,"authors":["Benjamin G. Lowe","Alexandra Woolgar","Sophie Smit","Anina N. Rich"],"bids_version":"1.11.0","contact_info":["Benjamin G. Lowe"],"contributing_labs":null,"data_processed":true,"dataset_doi":"doi:10.18112/openneuro.ds006768.v1.1.0","datatypes":["eeg"],"demographics":{"subjects_count":30,"ages":[25,19,18,20,20,21,20,29,19,18,17,27,17,21,27,18,17,18,20,18,20,18,21,18,17,18,19,18,18,30],"age_min":17,"age_max":30,"age_mean":20.2,"species":null,"sex_distribution":null,"handedness_distribution":{"r":28,"l":2}},"experimental_modalities":null,"external_links":{"source_url":"https://openneuro.org/datasets/ds006768","osf_url":null,"github_url":null,"paper_url":null},"funding":[],"ingestion_fingerprint":"f2fe7c07cdad154d4aefc087f912a14ca1674ca56fc9faac0461871b26a4be89","license":"CC0","n_contributing_labs":null,"name":"Multiple Object Monitoring (EEG)","readme":"Subjects (N = 30) completed a Multiple Object Monitoring (MOM) task. Methodological details can be read within the pre-print: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.10.663816\nPlease email ben.lowe@mq.edu.au if you have any further questions.","recording_modality":["eeg"],"senior_author":"Anina N. Rich","sessions":[],"size_bytes":7002555913,"source":"openneuro","study_design":null,"study_domain":null,"tasks":["MOM"],"timestamps":{"digested_at":"2026-04-22T12:29:35.827059+00:00","dataset_created_at":"2025-10-09T23:53:07.589Z","dataset_modified_at":"2025-10-10T05:01:22.000Z"},"total_files":210,"storage":{"backend":"s3","base":"s3://openneuro.org/ds006768","raw_key":"dataset_description.json","dep_keys":["CHANGES","README.txt","participants.json","participants.tsv","task-MOM_eeg.json","task-MOM_events.json","task-MOM_recording-eyetracking_physio.json"]},"tagger_meta":{"config_hash":"4a051be509a0e3d0","metadata_hash":"a27be60a1f856c78","model":"openai/gpt-5.2","tagged_at":"2026-01-20T19:07:52.239162+00:00"},"tags":{"pathology":["Healthy"],"modality":["Visual"],"type":["Attention"],"confidence":{"pathology":0.6,"modality":0.6,"type":0.65},"reasoning":{"few_shot_analysis":"Closest few-shot convention match for Type is the dataset \"EEG: DPX Cog Ctl Task in Acute Mild TBI\", which is labeled Type=Attention for a continuous performance / cognitive control style paradigm with cue/probe monitoring. The current dataset’s named paradigm \"Multiple Object Monitoring (MOM)\" similarly implies sustained monitoring/vigilance rather than sensory psychophysics (Perception) or reward/choice (Decision-making). For Pathology, most few-shots that simply describe \"subjects\"/\"participants\" without an explicit diagnosis are labeled Healthy (e.g., multiple healthy college-student task datasets). For Modality, many attention/monitoring paradigms in the few-shots are visual when stimuli are screen-based; MOM tasks are conventionally screen-based object monitoring, guiding a Visual modality inference.","metadata_analysis":"Only minimal metadata is provided. Key lines:\n1) \"Subjects (N = 30) completed a Multiple Object Monitoring (MOM) task.\"\n2) \"Methodological details can be read within the pre-print: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.10.663816\" \nNo explicit mention of clinical recruitment criteria, sensory stimulus type (visual/auditory), or rest/sleep conditions is included in the provided snippet.","paper_abstract_analysis":"No useful paper information.","evidence_alignment_check":"Pathology: Metadata says \"Subjects (N = 30)\" with no diagnosis stated. Few-shot pattern suggests that when no disorder/diagnosis is specified for a lab task dataset, label as Healthy. ALIGN (no conflict; inference consistent with conventions).\n\nModality: Metadata only names the task (\"Multiple Object Monitoring (MOM)\") and does not state stimulus modality. Few-shot pattern for monitoring/attention tasks commonly maps to Visual when tasks involve tracking/monitoring objects on a display. ALIGN but weak (metadata is silent; inference based on paradigm knowledge).\n\nType: Metadata says \"Multiple Object Monitoring (MOM) task\" which implies sustained monitoring. Few-shot pattern maps continuous monitoring/cognitive control paradigms to Attention rather than Perception/Decision-making. ALIGN (inference consistent with conventions; metadata not explicit about construct).","decision_summary":"Pathology top-2: (1) Healthy — supported by lack of any clinical descriptors and generic \"Subjects (N = 30)\"; consistent with few-shot convention that non-clinical task cohorts are Healthy. (2) Unknown — possible because health status is not explicitly stated. Final: Healthy. Confidence=0.6 because it is contextual inference only (no explicit \"healthy\" quote).\n\nModality top-2: (1) Visual — MOM paradigms are typically visual multiple-object monitoring/tracking; metadata gives task name only. (2) Unknown — because stimulus modality is not explicitly described in provided metadata. Final: Visual. Confidence=0.6 due to inference without direct stimulus description.\n\nType top-2: (1) Attention — \"Multiple Object Monitoring\" strongly indicates sustained attention/vigilance. (2) Perception — less likely if task is monitoring rather than discrimination/detection as the primary aim. Final: Attention. Confidence=0.65 because the task name supports the construct but no explicit statement (e.g., \"attention\"/\"vigilance\") is quoted."}},"computed_title":"Multiple Object Monitoring (EEG)","nchans_counts":[{"val":64,"count":210}],"sfreq_counts":[{"val":1000.0,"count":210}],"stats_computed_at":"2026-04-22T23:16:00.311948+00:00","total_duration_s":null,"author_year":"Lowe2025","canonical_name":null}}