{"success":true,"database":"eegdash","data":{"_id":"69d16e04897a7725c66f4c4c","dataset_id":"ds007473","associated_paper_doi":null,"authors":["Morgan Fogarty","Kalyan Tripathy","Alexandra M Svoboda","Mariel L Schroeder","Sean M Rafferty","Edward J Richter","Christopher Tracy","Patricia K Mansfield","Madison Booth","Andrew K Fishell","Arefeh Sherafati","Zachary E Markow","Muriah D Wheelock","Ana Maria Arbelaez","Bradley L Schlaggar","Christopher D Smyser","Adam T Eggebrecht","Joseph P Culver"],"bids_version":"","contact_info":["Morgan Fogarty"],"contributing_labs":null,"data_processed":true,"dataset_doi":"doi:10.18112/openneuro.ds007473.v1.0.0","datatypes":["fnirs"],"demographics":{"subjects_count":5,"ages":[],"age_min":null,"age_max":null,"age_mean":null,"species":null,"sex_distribution":null,"handedness_distribution":null},"experimental_modalities":null,"external_links":{"source_url":"https://openneuro.org/datasets/ds007473","osf_url":null,"github_url":null,"paper_url":null},"funding":[],"ingestion_fingerprint":"59f5d15965ca2c0a5d6338547e492da97d775a3448d6f70d64a7215db3f99201","license":"CC0","n_contributing_labs":null,"name":"High-Density Diffuse Optical Tomography Audiovisual Movie Viewing Dataset","readme":"This dataset consists of 5 participants completing functional localizer and movie viewing tasks. These data are stored in SNIRF format with optode and landmark locations associated with subject specific head models.\nSee the corresponding publication for more information about this dataset:\nTripathy K, Fogarty M, et al., \"Mapping brain function in adults and young children during naturalistic viewing with high-density diffuse optical tomography.\" Human Brain Mapping. 2024 May;45(7):e26684. doi: 10.1002/hbm.26684. PMID: 38703090; PMCID: PMC11069306.\nKalyan Tripathy, Zachary E. Markow, Morgan Fogarty, Mariel L. Schroeder, Alexa M. Svoboda, Adam T. Eggebrecht, Bradley L. Schlaggar, Jason W. Trobaugh, Joseph P. Culver, \"Multisensory naturalistic decoding with high-density diffuse optical tomography,\" Neurophoton. 12(1) 015002 (23 January 2025) https://doi.org/10.1117/1.NPh.12.1.015002","recording_modality":["fnirs"],"senior_author":"Joseph P Culver","sessions":["1","2","3","4","5","6","7","8"],"size_bytes":38961072704,"source":"openneuro","storage":{"backend":"s3","base":"s3://openneuro.org/ds007473","raw_key":"dataset_description.json","dep_keys":["CHANGES","README.md"]},"study_design":null,"study_domain":null,"tasks":["CCW001","CCW002","CCW003","HW001","HW002","HWM001","HWM002","HWM003","MOT001","MOT002","MOV001","MOV002","MOV003","MOV004","MOV005","MOV006","MOV007","MOV008","MOV009"],"timestamps":{"digested_at":"2026-04-22T12:30:19.294040+00:00","dataset_created_at":"2026-03-05T15:30:03.215Z","dataset_modified_at":"2026-03-05T21:29:32.000Z"},"total_files":189,"computed_title":"High-Density Diffuse Optical Tomography Audiovisual Movie Viewing Dataset","nchans_counts":[{"val":6782,"count":71},{"val":6928,"count":43},{"val":6880,"count":38},{"val":6750,"count":31},{"val":7030,"count":6}],"sfreq_counts":[{"val":10.41666666666667,"count":189}],"stats_computed_at":"2026-04-22T23:16:00.312821+00:00","total_duration_s":184040.83199999994,"tagger_meta":{"config_hash":"3557b68bca409f28","metadata_hash":"b9d8fc673be51274","model":"openai/gpt-5.2","tagged_at":"2026-04-07T09:32:40.872789+00:00"},"tags":{"pathology":["Healthy"],"modality":["Multisensory"],"type":["Perception"],"confidence":{"pathology":0.65,"modality":0.85,"type":0.7},"reasoning":{"few_shot_analysis":"Most similar few-shot convention for stimulus modality is the \"Cross-modal Oddball Task\" example, which labels concurrent visual+auditory cues as \"Multisensory\". This dataset is explicitly \"Audiovisual Movie Viewing\", matching the same mapping rule (stimulus channels drive Modality). For Type, the \"Subcortical responses to music and speech\" example shows that stimulus-driven sensory encoding studies are labeled as \"Perception\" (even when attention demands are minimal/unclear). No few-shot example suggests a clinical recruitment label in the absence of an explicit diagnosis, so the convention is to use \"Healthy\" when no disorder-focused recruitment is stated.","metadata_analysis":"Key population/task/stimulus facts from metadata: (1) Task paradigm: \"5 participants completing functional localizer and movie viewing tasks.\" (2) Stimulus modality: title explicitly says \"Audiovisual Movie Viewing Dataset\". (3) Study framing: cited paper title includes \"during naturalistic viewing\" and another includes \"Multisensory naturalistic decoding\" (from README: \"Mapping brain function ... during naturalistic viewing\"; \"Multisensory naturalistic decoding...\"). No diagnosis/clinical recruitment terms are present in title/description/README.","paper_abstract_analysis":"No paper abstract text was provided in the metadata (only citations), so no additional disambiguation is available beyond the titles indicating naturalistic viewing and multisensory decoding.","evidence_alignment_check":"Pathology: Metadata says no clinical group (e.g., only \"5 participants\" and tasks; no diagnosis terms). Few-shot pattern suggests using \"Healthy\" when there is no explicit disorder recruitment. ALIGN.\nModality: Metadata explicitly says \"Audiovisual Movie Viewing\" and mentions \"Multisensory naturalistic decoding\" (audiovisual implies combined auditory+visual). Few-shot convention (cross-modal oddball) maps combined auditory+visual stimulation to \"Multisensory\". ALIGN.\nType: Metadata emphasizes \"movie viewing\" and \"naturalistic viewing\" with \"multisensory ... decoding\"; this is stimulus-driven sensory processing rather than rest. Few-shot convention (music/speech ABR) labels stimulus-driven encoding/response studies as \"Perception\". Potential alternative is \"Other\" (naturalistic decoding/localizers), but overall ALIGN more strongly with Perception as the primary construct.","decision_summary":"Pathology top-2: (1) Healthy — supported by absence of any diagnosis/recruitment condition and generic \"5 participants\" wording; aligns with few-shot convention to default to Healthy when no disorder is specified. (2) Unknown — possible because demographics/health screening are not stated. Final: Healthy. Confidence 0.65 because evidence is mostly absence-of-evidence rather than explicit \"healthy\".\nModality top-2: (1) Multisensory — supported by \"Audiovisual Movie Viewing\" (title) and \"Multisensory naturalistic decoding\" (README citation title). (2) Visual — plausible if the movie were silent, but contradicted by \"Audiovisual\". Final: Multisensory. Confidence 0.85 based on two explicit phrases and strong few-shot analog.\nType top-2: (1) Perception — supported by \"movie viewing\"/\"naturalistic viewing\" framing implying sensory processing of audiovisual stimuli. (2) Other — plausible because the analysis focus could be decoding/localizers rather than a specific perceptual discrimination. Final: Perception. Confidence 0.7 (clear task/stimulus description but limited detail on cognitive construct beyond naturalistic viewing)."}},"canonical_name":null,"name_confidence":0.64,"name_meta":{"suggested_at":"2026-04-14T10:18:35.343Z","model":"openai/gpt-5.2 + openai/gpt-5.4-mini + deterministic_fallback"},"name_source":"author_year","author_year":"Fogarty2026_High"}}