{"success":true,"database":"eegdash","data":{"_id":"69d16e05897a7725c66f4cce","dataset_id":"nm000271","associated_paper_doi":"10.1038/s41597-025-06147-6","authors":["Wenwen Chang","Weixuan Kong","Guanghui Yan","Renjie Lv","Kaiyue Du","Muhammad Tariq Sadiq","Bin Guo","Rong Yin","Xuan Liu"],"bids_version":"1.9.0","contact_info":null,"contributing_labs":null,"data_processed":false,"dataset_doi":"doi:10.1038/s41597-025-06147-6","datatypes":["eeg"],"demographics":{"subjects_count":28,"ages":[],"age_min":null,"age_max":null,"age_mean":null,"species":null,"sex_distribution":null,"handedness_distribution":null},"experimental_modalities":null,"external_links":{"paper_url":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41597-025-06147-6.pdf"},"funding":[],"ingestion_fingerprint":"2a001ac3112ee79daa4a4e4728ab51a92217f7aabbe5697ba6e00bfe94c2ec03","license":"CC-BY-4.0","n_contributing_labs":null,"name":"Chang et al. 2025 — A multi-paradigm EEG dataset for studying upper limb rehabilitation exercises (Lanzhou Jiaotong University)","readme":null,"recording_modality":["eeg"],"senior_author":null,"sessions":["0","1","2","3","4","5"],"size_bytes":3715960545,"source":"nemar","storage":{"backend":"nemar","base":"s3://nemar/nm000271","raw_key":"dataset_description.json","dep_keys":[]},"study_design":null,"study_domain":null,"tasks":["imagery"],"timestamps":{"digested_at":"2026-04-30T14:09:49.224203+00:00","dataset_created_at":null,"dataset_modified_at":"2026-04-11T21:17:12Z"},"total_files":113,"computed_title":"Chang et al. 2025 — A multi-paradigm EEG dataset for studying upper limb rehabilitation exercises (Lanzhou Jiaotong University)","nchans_counts":[{"val":59,"count":113}],"sfreq_counts":[{"val":1000.0,"count":113}],"stats_computed_at":"2026-05-01T13:49:34.659509+00:00","total_duration_s":20969.887,"tagger_meta":{"model":"gpt-6-sol","taxonomy":"v2","config_hash":"39931253008fe2df","tagged_at":"2026-10-06T13:13:11Z","source":"eegdash-llm-tagger"},"tags":{"pathology":["Healthy"],"modality":["Visual"],"type":["Motor"],"confidence":{"pathology":0.8,"modality":0.4,"type":0.8},"reasoning":{"few_shot_analysis":"The EEG Motor Movement/Imagery example is the closest task match: it labels movement and imagery as Motor. Its Visual label follows from explicitly described targets appearing on a screen, which are not documented for this dataset. The healthy-participant examples support labeling a normative cohort Healthy.","metadata_analysis":"The title describes a dataset for \"upper limb rehabilitation exercises,\" and the listed task is \"imagery.\" The abstract states that \"28 healthy subjects were recruited\" and describes \"grasping and releasing with the left, right, or both hands.\" Neither the title, task listing, nor abstract specifies how any cues or stimuli were delivered.","paper_abstract_analysis":"The abstract establishes the recruited population and motor focus. Its reference to \"stroke survivors\" explains the motivation for rehabilitation research; it does not say that stroke survivors were recruited. It does not resolve stimulus modality.","evidence_alignment_check":"Pathology: Metadata says \"28 healthy subjects were recruited\"; healthy-cohort few-shot examples suggest Healthy. ALIGN. The stroke motivation does not conflict with the recruitment fact. Modality: Metadata lists \"imagery\" but does not state whether cues were presented; the motor-imagery example suggests Visual only when screen targets are specified. INSUFFICIENT MATCH, not a factual conflict; the example cannot supply a missing stimulus fact. Type: Metadata says \"upper limb rehabilitation exercises\" and describes \"grasping and releasing\"; the motor-imagery example suggests Motor. ALIGN. No administered treatment or treatment-effect comparison is stated.","decision_summary":"Pathology: Healthy versus Stroke; the explicit recruitment quote \"28 healthy subjects were recruited\" outweighs stroke as background motivation. Healthy, 0.8: one direct quote and a strong healthy-cohort few-shot analog. Modality: Unknown versus Visual; no cue or delivery channel is described, whereas the Visual motor-imagery example explicitly has screen targets. Unknown, 0.4: there is no direct stimulus-channel evidence. Type: Motor versus Intervention; \"upper limb rehabilitation exercises,\" \"imagery,\" and \"grasping and releasing with the left, right, or both hands\" support studying movement and imagery, while no intervention effect is specified. Motor, 0.8: multiple metadata features and a close few-shot match. No metadata fact was overridden by a few-shot pattern."}},"canonical_name":null,"name_confidence":0.66,"name_meta":{"suggested_at":"2026-04-14T10:18:35.344Z","model":"openai/gpt-5.2 + openai/gpt-5.4-mini + deterministic_fallback"},"name_source":"author_year","author_year":"Chang2025_2","associated_paper_meta":{"channel":"search","confidence":"high","author_overlap":7,"is_oa":true,"oa_status":"gold","source":"paper_resolver"}}}