{"success":true,"database":"eegdash","data":{"_id":"69d16e05897a7725c66f4cd1","dataset_id":"nm000301","associated_paper_doi":"10.1609/aaai.v40i48.42219","authors":["Boyla Mainsah","Chance Fleeting","Thomas Balmat","Eric Sellers","Leslie Collins"],"bids_version":"1.9.0","contact_info":null,"contributing_labs":null,"data_processed":false,"dataset_doi":"doi:10.13026/0byy-ry86","datatypes":["eeg"],"demographics":{"subjects_count":17,"ages":[],"age_min":null,"age_max":null,"age_mean":null,"species":null,"sex_distribution":{"m":10,"f":7},"handedness_distribution":null},"experimental_modalities":null,"external_links":{"paper_url":"https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v40i48.42219"},"funding":[],"ingestion_fingerprint":"0453882b5670ee06132727f256d130545cb3fcac405b7a6f6467219d7736aa4e","license":"CC-BY-4.0","n_contributing_labs":null,"name":"Mainsah et al. 2025 — bigP3BCI: An Open, Diverse and Machine Learning Ready P300-based Brain-Computer Interface Dataset (Study D)","readme":"Mainsah2025-D\n=============\nBigP3BCI Study D — 6x6 dynamic/row-column (17 healthy subjects).\nDataset Overview\n----------------\n  Code: Mainsah2025-D\n  Paradigm: p300\n  DOI: 10.13026/0byy-ry86\n  Subjects: 17\n  Sessions per subject: 1\n  Events: Target=2, NonTarget=1\n  Trial interval: [0, 1.0] s\nAcquisition\n-----------\n  Sampling rate: 256.0 Hz\n  Number of channels: 32\n  Channel types: eeg=32\n  Montage: standard_1020\n  Hardware: g.USBamp (g.tec)\n  Line frequency: 60.0 Hz\nParticipants\n------------\n  Number of subjects: 17\n  Health status: healthy\nExperimental Protocol\n---------------------\n  Paradigm: p300\n  Number of classes: 2\n  Class labels: Target, NonTarget\nHED Event Annotations\n---------------------\n  Schema: HED 8.4.0 | Browse: https://www.hedtags.org/hed-schema-browser\n  Target\n    ├─ Sensory-event\n    ├─ Experimental-stimulus\n    ├─ Visual-presentation\n    └─ Target\n  NonTarget\n    ├─ Sensory-event\n    ├─ Experimental-stimulus\n    ├─ Visual-presentation\n    └─ Non-target\nParadigm-Specific Parameters\n----------------------------\n  Detected paradigm: p300\nSignal Processing\n-----------------\n  Feature extraction: P300_ERP_detection\nCross-Validation\n----------------\n  Method: calibration-then-test\n  Evaluation type: within_subject\nBCI Application\n---------------\n  Applications: speller\n  Environment: laboratory\n  Online feedback: True\nTags\n----\n  Modality: visual\n  Type: perception\nDocumentation\n-------------\n  Description: BigP3BCI: the largest public P300 BCI dataset, containing EEG recordings from ~267 subjects across 20 studies using 6x6 or 9x8 character grids with various stimulus paradigms.\n  DOI: 10.13026/0byy-ry86\n  License: CC-BY-4.0\n  Investigators: Boyla Mainsah, Chance Fleeting, Thomas Balmat, Eric Sellers, Leslie Collins\n  Institution: Duke University; East Tennessee State University\n  Country: US\n  Repository: PhysioNet\n  Data URL: https://physionet.org/content/bigp3bci/1.0.0/\n  Publication year: 2025\nReferences\n----------\nAppelhoff, S., Sanderson, M., Brooks, T., Vliet, M., Quentin, R., Holdgraf, C., Chaumon, M., Mikulan, E., Tavabi, K., Hochenberger, R., Welke, D., Brunner, C., Rockhill, A., Larson, E., Gramfort, A. and Jas, M. (2019). MNE-BIDS: Organizing electrophysiological data into the BIDS format and facilitating their analysis. Journal of Open Source Software 4: (1896). https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01896\nPernet, C. R., Appelhoff, S., Gorgolewski, K. J., Flandin, G., Phillips, C., Delorme, A., Oostenveld, R. (2019). EEG-BIDS, an extension to the brain imaging data structure for electroencephalography. Scientific Data, 6, 103. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0104-8\n---\nGenerated by MOABB 1.5.0 (Mother of All BCI Benchmarks)\nhttps://github.com/NeuroTechX/moabb","recording_modality":["eeg"],"senior_author":null,"sessions":["0"],"size_bytes":773917495,"source":"nemar","storage":{"backend":"nemar","base":"s3://nemar/nm000301","raw_key":"dataset_description.json","dep_keys":["README","participants.json","participants.tsv"]},"study_design":null,"study_domain":null,"tasks":["p300"],"timestamps":{"digested_at":"2026-04-30T14:09:49.939890+00:00","dataset_created_at":null,"dataset_modified_at":"2026-04-11T21:05:11Z"},"total_files":307,"computed_title":"Mainsah et al. 2025 — bigP3BCI: An Open, Diverse and Machine Learning Ready P300-based Brain-Computer Interface Dataset (Study D)","nchans_counts":[{"val":32,"count":307}],"sfreq_counts":[{"val":256.0,"count":307}],"stats_computed_at":"2026-05-01T13:49:34.659556+00:00","total_duration_s":30867.80078125,"tagger_meta":{"model":"gpt-6-sol","taxonomy":"v2","config_hash":"39931253008fe2df","tagged_at":"2026-10-06T13:13:11Z","source":"eegdash-llm-tagger"},"tags":{"pathology":["Healthy"],"modality":["Visual"],"type":["Perception"],"confidence":{"pathology":0.8,"modality":0.9,"type":0.8},"reasoning":{"few_shot_analysis":"The schizophrenia-spectrum visual-discrimination example maps visual target discrimination to Perception despite a choice response. The Parkinson's cross-modal oddball example makes Attention a plausible alternative for target-versus-nontarget P300 events. These examples guide the comparison but do not determine the population of this study.","metadata_analysis":"Study D is described as “6x6 dynamic/row-column (17 healthy subjects)” and lists “Health status: healthy.” Its events include “Visual-presentation” for both Target and NonTarget, and its tags say “Modality: visual” and “Type: perception.” The application is a “speller,” with “Feature extraction: P300_ERP_detection.”","paper_abstract_analysis":"The abstract discusses P300 BCI models in individuals with ALS, but the Study D metadata explicitly identifies its 17 subjects as healthy. The abstract therefore cannot establish ALS recruitment for this dataset subset.","evidence_alignment_check":"Pathology: Metadata says “17 healthy subjects” and “Health status: healthy”; the healthy-volunteer BCI few-shot example suggests Healthy. ALIGN. The abstract's ALS population conflicts with this subset's metadata, so the explicit Study D recruitment facts win. Modality: Metadata says “Visual-presentation” and “Modality: visual”; the visual-task examples suggest Visual. ALIGN. Type: Metadata says “Type: perception” and identifies Target/NonTarget P300 stimuli; visual-discrimination convention suggests Perception, while the oddball convention suggests Attention. PARTIAL CONFLICT between analogous examples; the explicit dataset type tag and stimulus focus favor Perception.","decision_summary":"Pathology—Healthy versus ALS: two direct Study D facts (“17 healthy subjects”; “Health status: healthy”) outweigh the ALS-focused abstract; Healthy, confidence 0.8. Modality—Visual versus Multisensory: “Modality: visual,” visual presentation for both event classes, and the character-grid paradigm support Visual; no second sensory channel is specified; confidence 0.9. Type—Perception versus Attention: “Type: perception” and Target/NonTarget visual stimuli favor Perception, although P300 target monitoring makes Attention plausible; confidence 0.8. No metadata fact was overridden by a few-shot pattern."}},"canonical_name":null,"name_confidence":0.74,"name_meta":{"suggested_at":"2026-04-14T10:18:35.344Z","model":"openai/gpt-5.2 + openai/gpt-5.4-mini + deterministic_fallback"},"name_source":"author_year","author_year":"Mainsah2025_D","associated_paper_meta":{"channel":"search","confidence":"high","author_overlap":2,"is_oa":true,"oa_status":"gold","source":"paper_resolver"}}}